Colors

Data mode

Account

Login
Sign up

Collapse this

Support the Flora of the Southeastern US

2024 has been a banner year for making the best flora we can imagine. We've created:
With financial support from people like you, we are aiming even higher in 2025. Together we can accomplish all this: Vote on our 2025 priorities
  • Add Global Conservation Ranks (GRanks) vote
  • Professional graphic keys (polyclaves) to individual families/genera vote
  • 2 new FloraQuest apps: Florida & Mid-South vote
  • Image overlays highlighting diagnostic characters with arrows vote
  • iNaturalist integration in FloraQuest vote
Write-in vote: vote
We've set a goal of recruiting 200 ongoing supporters to donate $15 or more each month in 2025. Please help us reach this goal and make next year's flora even better:
Copy permalink to share

Urtica gracilis Aiton ssp. gracilis . American Stinging Nettle. Phen: May-Jul; Jul-Sep. Hab: Bottomland forests and edges, particularly over limestone or mafic rocks. Dist: NL (Labrador) and NS west to AK, south to sw. VA, w. NC, s. OH, s. IL, s. MO, n. TX, s. NM, and se. AZ.

Origin/Endemic status: Native

Taxonomy Comments: The native stinging nettle of North America is best treated as specifically distinct from U. dioica of Europe. Woodland (1982) and Woodland, Bassett, Crompton, & Forget (1982) showed that U. gracilis differs from U. dioica in a variety of morphologic characters (see key), chromosome number (2n = 26 for U. gracilis, 2n = 52 for U. dioica), breeding system (monoecy vs. dioecy), and distribution (North American vs. Eurasian); furthermore, the two taxa could not be crossed. Woodland (1982) chose subspecific status, apparently to emphasize the close relationship of the two (and a third taxa in w. North America). The combination of morphological distinctiveness, allopatry, major differences in species biology, and incompatibility warrants separation as species. F (as U. procera), G (as U. dioica var. procera) and S include NC in the range; Woodland (1982), however, showed the range as extending only south to VA. Henning et al. (2014) further validate the idea that American "U. dioica" is specifically distinct from European U. dioica.

Synonymy : = NY, Grosse-Veldmann & Weigend (2017), Henning et al (2014); = Urtica dioica L. ssp. gracilis (Aiton) Selander – FNA3, GrPl, K1, K3, K4, Mi, NE, Pa, Tn, Woodland (1982); = Urtica dioica L. var. procera (Muhl. ex Willd.) Wedd. – C; = Urtica gracilis Aiton – Ar, Il, S, S13, Tx, Va, WV; < Urtica dioica L. – RAB, Tat, W; > Urtica dioica L. var. procera (Muhl. ex Willd.) Wedd. – G; > Urtica gracilis Aiton – F; > Urtica procera Muhl. – F; > Urtica viridis Rydb. – F, G

Links to other floras: = Urtica dioica ssp. gracilis - FNA3

Show in key(s)

Show parent genus

Wetland Indicator Status:

  • Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain: FAC (taxonomic split from wetland indicator species)
  • Eastern Mountains and Piedmont: FACU (taxonomic split from wetland indicator species)
  • Great Plains: FAC (taxonomic split from wetland indicator species)
  • Midwest: FACW (taxonomic split from wetland indicator species)
  • Northcentral & Northeast: FAC (taxonomic split from wetland indicator species)

Heliophily : 3

Your browser does not support SVGs

Hover over a shape, letter, icon, or arrow on the map for definition or see the legend.

image of plant© Gary P. Fleming | Original Image ⭷
image of plant© Gary P. Fleming | Original Image ⭷
image of plant© Kirsten Johnson | Original Image ⭷
image of plant© Gary P. Fleming | Original Image ⭷
image of plant© Erik Danielson source | Original Image ⭷
image of plant© Erik Danielson source | Original Image ⭷

Feedback

See something wrong or missing on about Urtica gracilis ssp. gracilis? Let us know here: (Please include your name and email if at all complicated so we can clarify if needed.) We greatly appreciate feedback, and will include updates from you in our next webapp update, which can take a few months.